When the US political compass goes off the rails – and it’s still a pretty damn good one

The political compass, the thing that tells us what we should think, is one of the great wonders of our age.

Its power has been challenged by an array of factors, most notably our increasing dependence on technology.

But despite its recent challenges, its value remains indisputable.

If you’ve ever wondered what you’d be doing if the political compass was on a planet full of robots, you’re in luck: the future looks very different from the one we’re used to.

And it’s not just because we’re living in an era of automation.

We’re living through an era when the political world is changing.

In the United States, a growing number of politicians are abandoning traditional models of political engagement.

They are embracing online platforms like Twitter and Facebook, where the people who run the platforms are largely automated.

For many, this is a way to have their say without having to be directly in touch with voters.

But for others, it’s a way of getting away from the hard work of holding elected officials accountable.

In some cases, they are doing just that.

A number of recent examples suggest that in some parts of the country, politics is being automated as we speak.

Here are five of them: In Canada, where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has promised a digital revolution, it looks like Justin Trudeau is going to be the first prime minister to be entirely automated in office.

In fact, he’s so successful, his popularity has fallen so much, he was actually eliminated from the polls in May 2018. 

But he’s not the only prime minister facing the challenge of running an automated system. 

There’s a new president of Canada, who, according to his own team, is a little less human. 

It’s a little-known fact that US President Donald Trump has a virtual assistant, who answers his questions, tweets at him, and, in some cases (like the White House Correspondents Dinner), sends him a video of his speech to the nation.

This assistant, according a report by the US Department of Homeland Security, is called, “POTUS,” which stands for Presidential In-Person Communications System.

But this virtual assistant has its own issues. 

One of the more recent instances in which the US government was forced to turn to its virtual assistant to get answers was in January 2017, when Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn, a retired four-star general, was fired by Trump after he misled the White. 

Flynn was fired for misleading the White about the nature of conversations he had with the Russian ambassador to the US and a Russian official. 

When Flynn was fired, Trump blamed his resignation on a computer glitch, and he blamed his firing on Comey. 

“We have lost our leader.

He is gone,” Trump said, according the Washington Post. 

In the US, the most important thing about an automaton is that it is not necessarily human.

It’s like a human.

There’s nothing wrong with that.

That’s why it’s so important to keep in mind that automation is something that has a huge impact on political discourse, which is a very difficult subject to talk about because it’s in a very personal sphere. 

A couple of weeks ago, the American president announced that he was appointing a special envoy to China, which he said was “the most important country in the world.”

But China’s ambassador, Chen Yi, tweeted out that the appointment was for the purpose of “creating a better relationship between the two countries.” 

And what’s the purpose?

Chen said: China and the United Nations will discuss a “great and historic task,” and that China is the “leading power in the region.” 

I think that’s pretty clear.

But there’s a big difference between saying you’re going to put your country in a position to become a superpower, and saying you are going to start having a dialogue about how you’re gonna do that.

And if you can’t talk about that, I’m afraid you’re just going to have no way of actually doing it.

It would be a huge waste of resources to try and talk about this.

But we’re seeing it all the time, where people in positions of power in Washington are using a virtual version of their office to keep up appearances and appearances are not always there. 

The US Supreme Court has recently found that it’s legal for an American to sue the government of a foreign country that has taken steps to block the release of documents under a national security law. 

And in some states, such as Texas, a law called the “Freedom of Information Act” is actually in force.

The law allows citizens to file lawsuits under a variety of circumstances. 

Last week, the US House of Representatives voted to repeal the law.

The reason the law was repealed was because the House of representatives had decided that, if it passed, the law would be illegal,